RESUMEN
Context in implementation science includes not only characteristics of a setting in which an intervention will be delivered, but also social systems (e.g., interrelationships). Context is dynamic and interacts with both, the intervention and its implementation. Therefore, contextual analysis is recognized as an indispensable part of implementation science methodology: it provides the foundation for successful and sustainable implementation projects. Yet, driven by the prevailing post-positivist understanding of context, contextual analysis typically focuses on individual characteristics of context i.e., contextual dynamics and interactions go unnoticed. Conducting contextual analysis from a constructivist perspective promotes a multilayered approach, building a more comprehensive understanding of context, and thus facilitating successful implementation. In this article, we highlight the limitations of prevailing perspectives on context and approaches to contextual analysis. We then describe how contextual analysis can be enriched by working from a constructivist perspective. We finish with a discussion of the methodological and practical implications the proposed changes would entail. Emerging literature attempts to address both the concept of context and methods for contextual analysis. Various theories, models and frameworks consider context, however, many of these are reductionistic and do not acknowledge the dynamic nature of context or interactions within it. To complement recent conceptualizations of context, we suggest consider the following five constructivist concepts: 1) social space;2) social place;3) agency;4) sensation;and 5) embodiment. We demonstrate the value of these concepts using COVID-19 vaccination uptake as an example and integrate the concepts in the Context and Implementation of Complex Interventions (CICI) framework—an implementation science framework that pays ample attention to context. To study context from a constructivist perspective, we also suggest additional considerations in view of methodologies for data collection and analysis, e.g., rapid ethnographic methods. A constructivist perspective contributes to a stronger conceptualization of contextual analysis. Considering the five constructivist concepts helps to overcome contextual analysis' current shortcomings, while revealing complex dynamics that usually go unnoticed. Thus, more comprehensive understanding of context can be developed to inform subsequent phases of an implementation project, thereby maximizing an intervention's uptake and sustainability.
RESUMEN
Context in implementation science includes not only characteristics of a setting in which an intervention will be delivered, but also social systems (e.g., interrelationships). Context is dynamic and interacts with both, the intervention and its implementation. Therefore, contextual analysis is recognized as an indispensable part of implementation science methodology: it provides the foundation for successful and sustainable implementation projects. Yet, driven by the prevailing post-positivist understanding of context, contextual analysis typically focuses on individual characteristics of context i.e., contextual dynamics and interactions go unnoticed. Conducting contextual analysis from a constructivist perspective promotes a multilayered approach, building a more comprehensive understanding of context, and thus facilitating successful implementation. In this article, we highlight the limitations of prevailing perspectives on context and approaches to contextual analysis. We then describe how contextual analysis can be enriched by working from a constructivist perspective. We finish with a discussion of the methodological and practical implications the proposed changes would entail. Emerging literature attempts to address both the concept of context and methods for contextual analysis. Various theories, models and frameworks consider context, however, many of these are reductionistic and do not acknowledge the dynamic nature of context or interactions within it. To complement recent conceptualizations of context, we suggest consider the following five constructivist concepts: 1) social space; 2) social place; 3) agency; 4) sensation; and 5) embodiment. We demonstrate the value of these concepts using COVID-19 vaccination uptake as an example and integrate the concepts in the Context and Implementation of Complex Interventions (CICI) framework-an implementation science framework that pays ample attention to context. To study context from a constructivist perspective, we also suggest additional considerations in view of methodologies for data collection and analysis, e.g., rapid ethnographic methods. A constructivist perspective contributes to a stronger conceptualization of contextual analysis. Considering the five constructivist concepts helps to overcome contextual analysis' current shortcomings, while revealing complex dynamics that usually go unnoticed. Thus, more comprehensive understanding of context can be developed to inform subsequent phases of an implementation project, thereby maximizing an intervention's uptake and sustainability.
RESUMEN
Critical gaps exist in our knowledge on how best to provide quality person-centered care to long-term care (LTC) home residents which is closely tied to not knowing what the ideal staff is complement in the home. A survey was created on staffing in LTC homes before and during the COVID-19 pandemic to determine how the staff complement changed. Perspectives were garnered from researchers, clinicians, and policy experts in eight countries and the data provides a first approximation of staffing before and during the pandemic. Five broad categories of staff working in LTC homes were as follows: (1) those responsible for personal and support care, (2) nursing care, (3) medical care, (4) rehabilitation and recreational care, and (5) others. There is limited availability of data related to measuring staff complement in the home and those with similar roles had different titles making it difficult to compare between countries. Nevertheless, the survey results highlight that some categories of staff were either absent or deemed non-essential during the pandemic. We require standardized high-quality workforce data to design better decision-making tools for staffing and planning, which are in line with the complex care needs of the residents and prevent precarious work conditions for staff.
RESUMEN
The COVID-19 epidemic has brought to light the significant problems in the long-term care (LTC) sector, specifically the lack of an infrastructure to collect and aggregate data between LTC sectors in different countries. This talk will briefly describe goals of the WE-THRIVE initiative, and focus on exploring the development of “workforce and staffing” common data elements for LTC. We will describe how the subgroup is “laying down the groundwork” within this domain with various methodologies to develop CDEs related to workforce and staffing. The CDEs aim to measure staff retention and turnover, evaluating nursing supervisor effectiveness, and staff training in LTC. Anticipated challenges of this international work will also be highlighted. International research on LTC can valuably inform LTC policy and practice, and the proposed CDEs can facilitate data sharing and aggregation internationally, including low-, middle-, and high-income countries.
RESUMEN
There is an absence of high-quality workforce data that could be used globally for comparative research on workforce planning in the residential long-term care (LTC) sector. We know that older adults residing in the LTC settings have multimorbidities resulting in complex care needs, yet the workforce is insufficiently able to meet their needs. A further reduction in LTC workforce was noted during the COVID-19 pandemic which increased the risk of adverse outcomes for residents. Survey results focused on the workforce in LTC homes collected from several countries during the current pandemic, highlighted that several members of the workforce were either absent or worked virtually (e.g., physicians, social workers). A better understanding of who is/or should be in the house to meet the needs of residents during or after future pandemics requires a workforce data system that routinely collects this information to ensure best quality outcomes for residents and their carers.
RESUMEN
COVID-19 has affected long-term residential care (LTRC) disproportionally due to the high-risk population, lack of resources and insufficient preventative measures. Protective measures, including quarantine and strict visitation restrictions have made transitions into LTRC more challenging. Further insight is needed to understand how residents, relatives and staff have experienced this during the COVID-19 pandemic. During four months of fieldwork in a LTRC facility in Switzerland, a rapid ethnography consisting of interviews, observations, informal conversations and document analysis was conducted. This study included a total of 14 residents, 21 healthcare staff from varying departments and 7 relatives of residents. First results indicate that protective measures interfere with a resident’s ability to find meaningful activities and interactions within LTRC as well as the possibility to maintain mobility. This and limited family contact following a move into LTRC prevents a smooth transition from home to LTRC and impacts overall resident quality of life.
RESUMEN
Unplanned transfers from nursing homes (NHs) are burdensome, associated with adverse outcomes for residents and costly for health care systems. Internationally, NHs are facing similar issues whereby a lack of geriatric expertise combined with a shortage of NH general practitioners require innovative and adaptable models of care tailored to the organizational context. In this symposium, we will present studies from the MOQI project from the United States, which successfully reduced unnecessary hospitalizations by embedding advanced practice registered nurses (APRN) in 16 US NHs over a 6-year period. We will discuss the influence of race on multiple hospital transfers and present possible interventions to reduce transfers. Next, we will present finding from a study with MOQI APRNs that highlighted their contributions to the COVID-19 pandemic response in NHs and discuss the broader implication or infection control practices. In addition, we will present the INTERCARE project which successfully reduced unplanned hospitalizations in 11 Swiss NHs, by implementing a registered nurse with an expanded role, to compensate for the very limited access to APRNs;which is the case for many European countries. Both MOQI and INTERCARE pinpoint the importance of strategies to support the introduction of a new role in NHs. Both projects will give examples of different models of care which can be feasibly implemented to sustainably decrease unnecessary hospitalizations, in different contexts and with different resources. Finally, data from the INTERCARE study will address the issue of potentially avoidable fall-related transfers and which resources are deemed appropriate to mitigate these.